Built from 1984-1988, this thing was a disaster in
spectacular fashion, and a supreme piece of junk! The concept represented
something totally different for Pontiac and GM. The idea had so much potential
and it really wanted to be a cool, sporty, mid-engine sports car, but what it
ended up being was a terrible, unreliable, fire-ball on wheels. The reason I
say fire ball is because of more than one problem that came about after the car
was released that had a tendency to make the engine compartment erupt in flames
and burn the car to the ground.
With the front suspension of a Chevette and the rear
suspension of a Citation, what could be bad? To clarify, the rear suspension
that came from the Chevy Citation was the front suspension from the Citation,
but it was used on the rear end of the Fiero because the Fiero was rear-wheel
drive, and the engine options on the Citation and the Fiero were very similar.
Regardless, any time you hear the words Chevette, Citation, and Fiero together,
you know that the discussion is not about anything good. Despite the suspension
design the vehicle handling was not too terrible because of the mid-engine
setup, but everything was so poorly executed that it had a lot of maintenance
problems. “Maintenance problems,” is kind of a nice way to say that it fell
apart right and left and there was nothing that anyone could do about it. The
car was competition for the similarly mid-engined Toyota MR2 but there is
absolutely no comparison between the two.
1984 Pontiac Fiero |
To make this bucket of bolts even better (worse), the base
engine was the 2.5L pushrod boat anchor that was found in other piece of junk Pontiacs
of the day. These four cylinder engines were the ones that were catching on
fire. They would catch fire when the engine would throw a connecting rod
through the side of the block and spill the contents of the crankcase onto the
hot exhaust. Car-b-que! Flames erupting from the engine compartment were a bad
thing but considering the fact that the flames resulted from dramatic engine
failure, you might as well go ahead and let the thing burn down because it’s
going to need a new engine anyway. Talk about adding insult to injury. It’s one
thing to have the engine break apart, but it takes a real piece of work to then
only seconds later catch on fire.
Besides blowing up the engine to catch everything on fire,
the vehicle was also thought to have a wiring problem in the engine compartment
that could result in fires. Wiring connectors could get hot being in the wrong
places in the engine compartment. When the insulation melts off of electrical
wires and the wires touch each other or short out on the body or engine, the
amount of heat that results has a tendency to burn things to the ground.
Because of the way the cooling system was designed, and the fact that the
engine was in the rear, the engines also had a tendency to overheat because air
would become trapped in the cooling system and these air pockets would block
the coolant from circulating.
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT a much better car than the original but... |
The initial four cylinder engine was good for all of about
97 HP and it clattered like your grandma’s sewing machine. The V6 wasn't nearly
as bad, but it was only good for 140 HP. Not having much power is really not
the worst thing, the biggest problem is that the entire car was so unreliable
and had so many mechanical problems, it didn't really matter what kind of
engine it had, it didn't matter how it looked, how it handled, or how it was
designed. The fact that it was pure unmitigated garbage is the biggest sin here
and it is the thing that makes it one of the worst cars ever made. The second
generation Fiero was significantly improved but it was too late, the damage was
done and sales never recovered to a level that would allow the model to
survive. If you go to a restaurant and they serve you burned chicken, are you
ever going to order the chicken again?
A mid-mounted V6 that only produced 140 HP |
This car being so terrible does not preclude some people
from liking it. The internet is loaded with clubs and discussion boards that
allow Fiero aficionados to come together and commiserate on all things Fiero. Despite
the fact that this is such a terrible car, if some people like them so much
that they want to band together online, or on the weekends, and fix them up,
talk about them and modify them to make them fast, then I say go for it. The
one thing that the Fiero has going for it is that it is different. It’s not
good, but it is different.
A real abomination. This is not a Lamboghini Diablo, it is a Pontiac Fiero dressed up with a kit. |
Seriously, I consider your blog is one amongst best blogs that I found. Your efforts awfully help make reading your blog considerably easier.
ReplyDeletechrysler 300 grills
No bias there is there? Fiero was a concept car that was decades ahead of its time. The sheer ingenious concepts of the mid-engine car resonate back to its designers in line with Ferrari or other Italian sportsters of the time. The nimble mid-engine design made quick work of steering and handling which led the fieros to be a classic favorite of the race circuit with their aerodynamic sleekness and grace around curves and the tracks. The true downfall of the fiero was that it drove a stake into the heart of corvette sales: Why pay 30-40K on a corvette when the little brother fiero was around 10K or so? I have read this article several times with confusion and an open jaw at how inaccurate and generally anti-fiero it is. Did one run over your cat or something? There must be some kind of latent anger in you to make you spew like you have in this article... Interesting.
ReplyDeleteStill big pieces of crap
DeleteExcellently written article, if only all blogger offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place.
ReplyDeletejunk car removal
I just now open your blog and read contenet.Its really nice blog.v-stilshop
ReplyDelete